According to data acquired by Finbold, Singaporean athletes earn $744,000 for winning the gold medal, $372,000 for the silver medal, and $286,000 for the bronze medal. The gold prize money is at least 20 times more than the $37,500 earned by United States athletes. For silver and bronze medals, U.S. athletes earn $22,500 and $15,000, respectively. Among selected 12 countries, Singaporean athlete earnings rank in the first spot while the U.S. is in the 11th position. Elsewhere, Hong Kong ranks second, with athletes taking home $644,000, $322,000, and $161,000 for gold, silver, and bronze medals, respectively. For host athletes in Japan, they earn $45,200, $18,100, and $9,045 for gold, silver, and bronze medals respectively. Australia ranks in the 12th spot, with the country’s Olympic participants taking home $15,100 for gold medal wins. Olympic athlete earnings data is provided by Money Under 30.
Explaining the difference in Olympic prize money earnings
Although the International Olympic Committee (IOC) manages the games, the organization does not pay prize money to winners. Therefore, many athletes receive payments from their countries, explaining the vast difference between the prize money. However, not all countries offer a prize for a medal earned at the Olympics. For instance, Great Britain doesn’t pay additional money for medals. Worth noting is that athletes from competitive countries like the United States are making less money than other less competitive countries like Singapore. The variation between the competitive and less competitive countries is exhibited by the current medal standing. For instance, by writing, Singapore was not among the countries that had earned a medal at the games. Elsewhere, the U.S. ranks in the second spot with 61 medals, including 21 gold. Additionally, countries paying a high amount of money are still attempting to establish themselves in the Olympic Games. Therefore, the considerable prize money acts as a critical motivating factor for athletes. For competitive countries, the athlete earnings are substituted by other revenue streams like corporate endorsements. Furthermore, these athletes earn monetary and non-monetary gains from the host countries to have a podium finish. The respective sports associations pay stipends including training grants, health insurance, and college scholarships. Such financial support allows athletes to focus on their training and performance and not be distracted by financial pressures. It is worth noting that Olympics usually occur after four years, meaning that very few competitors end up earning enough sponsorship money to underwrite their entire careers. With a limited number of medals at the Olympics, many athletes are not fortunate to land sponsorships, endorsements, and medal bonuses. Therefore, in some countries, athletes planning to participate in the Olympics are sponsored by their governments, family, friends, and local communities.
Need to leverage on the Olympic stage
Interestingly, despite Olympic athletes receiving monetary and non-monetary rewards, most are not financially stable. A survey by the Associated Press indicated that about 58% of athletes from 48 countries are not financially stable. Notably, some have not received any money from their national federation to take part in the Olympics. Over the years, there have been calls to have the IOC leverage on the Olympic stage and increase marketing to ensure athletes cash on the games. However, the IOC argues the event needs an uncluttered advertising space to preserve the tradition.
